Download in
Google Play
0
Share
Save
Sign up
Access to all documents
Join milions of students
Improve your grades
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Sign up
Access to all documents
Join milions of students
Improve your grades
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Sign up
Access to all documents
Join milions of students
Improve your grades
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
11 CONTROLLER TUNING -adjusting the controlle settings / tuning parametus - compromise between performance 9. Ichustness Performance - fast smooth response to changes Robustness - ability of the controler to remain stable. Tutung Techniques A Classical Tuning Techniques. + Ziegler Nichols 2. Cohen - Coon Tuning Method - Cohen Co B. Alternative techniques Orect Synthesis (DS), Method. 2. Internal mode control (IMC) 3. Controller tuning relations. Ziegler & Nichols - John G. Ziegler & Nathaniel & Nichols SECOND METHOD Based on closed -loop concepts requiring comadation of Kcu & Pu Assuming P-controllen Pu is also decived! TUNING PARAMETERS Controller Ro Kohlz t 4 frequency response techniques 13. Computer simulation 6. On-line tuning Kcu/2.2 Pull-2 Kcull 7 Pul₂ to 0 ..0. P.ID GIVEN GIVEN the following systern, use the second method of zeegler & Nichols to determine the PID controller tuning paramita's Ysp GCCs) G.(s) → (cs). GGS) = (2+1) (543) (5+5) (a) det the controller transfer function Gccs) be that of a P-controller. Keu, GC (s) = Rcy b. bet the open loop transfer function Gou -Reu- GOL (5+1) (5+3)(5+5) C. del GOL +1 =0. notice that this is also the characteristic equation of the feedback system in the figure 5³ 195² 1235 + 15 + Kču =O 2 Kcu GOL= PID Pu X (JWm)³ + 9 (SW) ² + 23 (JWm) + 15 - U (Wm) ³ + 9(0)² + 23 (@m) + 15 imaginary part: teal part: -J(wm)² + 29 (JWm) =0 9w² + 1s + Rcu = 0 day dt لال - 5 U Rc Rcul 17 Pú Pula to Puls d²u Idt Wm = ±4.795.8 6. 211 4.7958 + (3+₁)(513)(3+5) Kcu 211...
iOS User
Stefan S, iOS User
SuSSan, iOS User
= W (5² +45+3)(5+5) Kcu -√ (Wm) ³ + 23 (JWm) =J + Jun WAO --Wm² + 20 =0 S 3 +55² +45² + 20 5+3 5+. 15. +255+ 15 + Kcu = 0 = 112.9412 70. 6551 0.1638 For Transher Functions: cdy ldt (si + 6s²+8) Y (5) == sitost = 1.3101 18y 7 to edirtsy = 3t dt YO= -Y(S) = 5² (s + 4) ($12) Kdu - 192 b s²Y(s) + (SY (5) +,8Y(s) = 3 (5²) ²: 0 5²46518 -5² (5³² +65 +5) initial parameters (-1)) -1 _A = + 3₂ B = 2 3 + Kcu=0 + Kcu = 0 3² (5+2)/(1+²) 32+ 3+ √₂ + ² 52(512X5+4) st2 Sty 13 = A (5) (5+₂)($+4) + B (sta) (5+₁) + DGK(SK) J-√T A + C + D 32. 6 = GA + B + 4 ct 20 S'. 8A 1GB 813 18: OF 7 √² = √-1² 3 1-4- 1321 Y(3) y (t) == 3/2 45° tills 18 5452-45-24 SOLUTION: -9/32/ GIVEN -12 mA (Gia) For PI Controller 0.5 mA -P (t) = K₂ e(t) ip в ком Transfer Function PI controller P₁(5) Ka _P₁(s) = a kc @t-o S Kc [ 1+ = - ] = k₁ + Kc; -E's) = 1/ tis LIS Ксм Pi(5) -2/32 Sty St. 2 4740²2² - 1/2 C-16 32 + P₁(+) = KCM + KCM t it LE.(S). 2.3 MA KcM KCM = 6.7- 8.0 = -1.3 mA 1-3 MA -= -0.52 (DAC) TI = 39. 1566 PID Controller -Kc- 01 $² -0.0332 mA/s _T₁__ (-0.52) (2.5 mA) = -0.0332 mA/s ts +++ Ups -
Basic concepts and roles of controller in process control
0
9
The basics of the five types of chemical reactions.
0
Friendly Chemistry lesson 27. How to use molar solutions to predict grams produced
264
AP Chemistry Stoichiometry
13
Learn to determine now much of a product is in something using the converting method, Stoichiometry
2
Includes definition of lewis structures, examples, differences between single, double, and triple bonds, and steps to draw a lewis structure. Also includes practice problems.
11 CONTROLLER TUNING -adjusting the controlle settings / tuning parametus - compromise between performance 9. Ichustness Performance - fast smooth response to changes Robustness - ability of the controler to remain stable. Tutung Techniques A Classical Tuning Techniques. + Ziegler Nichols 2. Cohen - Coon Tuning Method - Cohen Co B. Alternative techniques Orect Synthesis (DS), Method. 2. Internal mode control (IMC) 3. Controller tuning relations. Ziegler & Nichols - John G. Ziegler & Nathaniel & Nichols SECOND METHOD Based on closed -loop concepts requiring comadation of Kcu & Pu Assuming P-controllen Pu is also decived! TUNING PARAMETERS Controller Ro Kohlz t 4 frequency response techniques 13. Computer simulation 6. On-line tuning Kcu/2.2 Pull-2 Kcull 7 Pul₂ to 0 ..0. P.ID GIVEN GIVEN the following systern, use the second method of zeegler & Nichols to determine the PID controller tuning paramita's Ysp GCCs) G.(s) → (cs). GGS) = (2+1) (543) (5+5) (a) det the controller transfer function Gccs) be that of a P-controller. Keu, GC (s) = Rcy b. bet the open loop transfer function Gou -Reu- GOL (5+1) (5+3)(5+5) C. del GOL +1 =0. notice that this is also the characteristic equation of the feedback system in the figure 5³ 195² 1235 + 15 + Kču =O 2 Kcu GOL= PID Pu X (JWm)³ + 9 (SW) ² + 23 (JWm) + 15 - U (Wm) ³ + 9(0)² + 23 (@m) + 15 imaginary part: teal part: -J(wm)² + 29 (JWm) =0 9w² + 1s + Rcu = 0 day dt لال - 5 U Rc Rcul 17 Pú Pula to Puls d²u Idt Wm = ±4.795.8 6. 211 4.7958 + (3+₁)(513)(3+5) Kcu 211...
11 CONTROLLER TUNING -adjusting the controlle settings / tuning parametus - compromise between performance 9. Ichustness Performance - fast smooth response to changes Robustness - ability of the controler to remain stable. Tutung Techniques A Classical Tuning Techniques. + Ziegler Nichols 2. Cohen - Coon Tuning Method - Cohen Co B. Alternative techniques Orect Synthesis (DS), Method. 2. Internal mode control (IMC) 3. Controller tuning relations. Ziegler & Nichols - John G. Ziegler & Nathaniel & Nichols SECOND METHOD Based on closed -loop concepts requiring comadation of Kcu & Pu Assuming P-controllen Pu is also decived! TUNING PARAMETERS Controller Ro Kohlz t 4 frequency response techniques 13. Computer simulation 6. On-line tuning Kcu/2.2 Pull-2 Kcull 7 Pul₂ to 0 ..0. P.ID GIVEN GIVEN the following systern, use the second method of zeegler & Nichols to determine the PID controller tuning paramita's Ysp GCCs) G.(s) → (cs). GGS) = (2+1) (543) (5+5) (a) det the controller transfer function Gccs) be that of a P-controller. Keu, GC (s) = Rcy b. bet the open loop transfer function Gou -Reu- GOL (5+1) (5+3)(5+5) C. del GOL +1 =0. notice that this is also the characteristic equation of the feedback system in the figure 5³ 195² 1235 + 15 + Kču =O 2 Kcu GOL= PID Pu X (JWm)³ + 9 (SW) ² + 23 (JWm) + 15 - U (Wm) ³ + 9(0)² + 23 (@m) + 15 imaginary part: teal part: -J(wm)² + 29 (JWm) =0 9w² + 1s + Rcu = 0 day dt لال - 5 U Rc Rcul 17 Pú Pula to Puls d²u Idt Wm = ±4.795.8 6. 211 4.7958 + (3+₁)(513)(3+5) Kcu 211...
iOS User
Stefan S, iOS User
SuSSan, iOS User
= W (5² +45+3)(5+5) Kcu -√ (Wm) ³ + 23 (JWm) =J + Jun WAO --Wm² + 20 =0 S 3 +55² +45² + 20 5+3 5+. 15. +255+ 15 + Kcu = 0 = 112.9412 70. 6551 0.1638 For Transher Functions: cdy ldt (si + 6s²+8) Y (5) == sitost = 1.3101 18y 7 to edirtsy = 3t dt YO= -Y(S) = 5² (s + 4) ($12) Kdu - 192 b s²Y(s) + (SY (5) +,8Y(s) = 3 (5²) ²: 0 5²46518 -5² (5³² +65 +5) initial parameters (-1)) -1 _A = + 3₂ B = 2 3 + Kcu=0 + Kcu = 0 3² (5+2)/(1+²) 32+ 3+ √₂ + ² 52(512X5+4) st2 Sty 13 = A (5) (5+₂)($+4) + B (sta) (5+₁) + DGK(SK) J-√T A + C + D 32. 6 = GA + B + 4 ct 20 S'. 8A 1GB 813 18: OF 7 √² = √-1² 3 1-4- 1321 Y(3) y (t) == 3/2 45° tills 18 5452-45-24 SOLUTION: -9/32/ GIVEN -12 mA (Gia) For PI Controller 0.5 mA -P (t) = K₂ e(t) ip в ком Transfer Function PI controller P₁(5) Ka _P₁(s) = a kc @t-o S Kc [ 1+ = - ] = k₁ + Kc; -E's) = 1/ tis LIS Ксм Pi(5) -2/32 Sty St. 2 4740²2² - 1/2 C-16 32 + P₁(+) = KCM + KCM t it LE.(S). 2.3 MA KcM KCM = 6.7- 8.0 = -1.3 mA 1-3 MA -= -0.52 (DAC) TI = 39. 1566 PID Controller -Kc- 01 $² -0.0332 mA/s _T₁__ (-0.52) (2.5 mA) = -0.0332 mA/s ts +++ Ups -