Download in
Google Play
18
Share
Save
Sign up
Access to all documents
Join milions of students
Improve your grades
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Sign up
Access to all documents
Join milions of students
Improve your grades
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Memory A01 EXPLANATIONS FOR FORGETTING: RETRIEVAL FAILURE Retrieval failure theory If specific cues are not available during recall, this may cause retrieval failure Encoding specificity principle Tulving (1983) found a pattern called encoding specificity principle - a cue must be present during encoding and retrieval - forgetting will occur if not available at both Context-dependent forgetting External cues Godden and Baddeley studied deep-sea divers Procedure divers had to learn a list of words on land or underwater and then recall on land or underwater 1. Learn on land - Recall on land 2. Learn on land - Recall underwater 3. Learn underwater - Recall underwater 4. Learn underwater - Recall on land Findings - recall 40% in non-matching conditions State-dependent forgetting Internal cues Procedure - Carter and Cassaday (1998) gave hay fever drugs to participants that made them drowsy. They had to learn words and recall 1. Learn on drug - Recall on drug 2. Learn on drug - Recall off drug 3. Learn off drug - Recall off drug 4. Learn off drug - Recall on drug A03 Paper 1 Findings - Recall was best when learning and recall were the same. When cues were absent, forgetting increased Evaluation Supporting evidence Research support from studies such as Godden and Baddeley and Carter and Cassaday Eysenck (2010) argues retrieval failure is the main reason for forgetting from LTM Questioning context effects Memory Paper 1 Baddeley (1997)...
iOS User
Stefan S, iOS User
SuSSan, iOS User
argues context effects are not strong, especially in real life - contexts have to be very different before an effect is seen E.g. learning in one room and recalling in another is unlikely to result in forgetting as environments are not too different Recall versus recognition Context effect only relates to the type of memory tested Godden and Baddeley (1980) repeated their experiment but words were read to them instead of recalled. They had to say when they recognised a word read to them. Performance was the same in all conditions Problems with the encoding specificity principle The encoding specificity principle cannot be tested When a cue produces successful recall, we assume the cue must have been encoded at the time of learning, or not with unsuccessful recall These are just assumptions, as there no way to know if the cue has been encoded or not Real-life applications Baddeley suggests context-related cues are worth paying attention to E.g. going from your bedroom downstairs to get something, forgetting, and then remembering when back in bedroom
18
Share
Save
Psychology - Memory
5
AO1 and AO3
0
0
13
Retrieval failure due to absence of cues: not being able to access memories that are there
22
Full topic of memory
150
notes for the whole memory topic
Memory A01 EXPLANATIONS FOR FORGETTING: RETRIEVAL FAILURE Retrieval failure theory If specific cues are not available during recall, this may cause retrieval failure Encoding specificity principle Tulving (1983) found a pattern called encoding specificity principle - a cue must be present during encoding and retrieval - forgetting will occur if not available at both Context-dependent forgetting External cues Godden and Baddeley studied deep-sea divers Procedure divers had to learn a list of words on land or underwater and then recall on land or underwater 1. Learn on land - Recall on land 2. Learn on land - Recall underwater 3. Learn underwater - Recall underwater 4. Learn underwater - Recall on land Findings - recall 40% in non-matching conditions State-dependent forgetting Internal cues Procedure - Carter and Cassaday (1998) gave hay fever drugs to participants that made them drowsy. They had to learn words and recall 1. Learn on drug - Recall on drug 2. Learn on drug - Recall off drug 3. Learn off drug - Recall off drug 4. Learn off drug - Recall on drug A03 Paper 1 Findings - Recall was best when learning and recall were the same. When cues were absent, forgetting increased Evaluation Supporting evidence Research support from studies such as Godden and Baddeley and Carter and Cassaday Eysenck (2010) argues retrieval failure is the main reason for forgetting from LTM Questioning context effects Memory Paper 1 Baddeley (1997)...
Memory A01 EXPLANATIONS FOR FORGETTING: RETRIEVAL FAILURE Retrieval failure theory If specific cues are not available during recall, this may cause retrieval failure Encoding specificity principle Tulving (1983) found a pattern called encoding specificity principle - a cue must be present during encoding and retrieval - forgetting will occur if not available at both Context-dependent forgetting External cues Godden and Baddeley studied deep-sea divers Procedure divers had to learn a list of words on land or underwater and then recall on land or underwater 1. Learn on land - Recall on land 2. Learn on land - Recall underwater 3. Learn underwater - Recall underwater 4. Learn underwater - Recall on land Findings - recall 40% in non-matching conditions State-dependent forgetting Internal cues Procedure - Carter and Cassaday (1998) gave hay fever drugs to participants that made them drowsy. They had to learn words and recall 1. Learn on drug - Recall on drug 2. Learn on drug - Recall off drug 3. Learn off drug - Recall off drug 4. Learn off drug - Recall on drug A03 Paper 1 Findings - Recall was best when learning and recall were the same. When cues were absent, forgetting increased Evaluation Supporting evidence Research support from studies such as Godden and Baddeley and Carter and Cassaday Eysenck (2010) argues retrieval failure is the main reason for forgetting from LTM Questioning context effects Memory Paper 1 Baddeley (1997)...
iOS User
Stefan S, iOS User
SuSSan, iOS User
argues context effects are not strong, especially in real life - contexts have to be very different before an effect is seen E.g. learning in one room and recalling in another is unlikely to result in forgetting as environments are not too different Recall versus recognition Context effect only relates to the type of memory tested Godden and Baddeley (1980) repeated their experiment but words were read to them instead of recalled. They had to say when they recognised a word read to them. Performance was the same in all conditions Problems with the encoding specificity principle The encoding specificity principle cannot be tested When a cue produces successful recall, we assume the cue must have been encoded at the time of learning, or not with unsuccessful recall These are just assumptions, as there no way to know if the cue has been encoded or not Real-life applications Baddeley suggests context-related cues are worth paying attention to E.g. going from your bedroom downstairs to get something, forgetting, and then remembering when back in bedroom