Download in
Google Play
Personality
Abnormal psychology
Consciousness
Human development
Sensation and perception
Research methods in psychology
Overview
Learning and memory
Biological bases of behavior
Ethical issues in psychology
Motivation and emotion
Introduction to psychology
Cognition and intelligence
Social psychology
Show all topics
7/25/2022
367
14
Share
Save
Sign up
Access to all documents
Join milions of students
Improve your grades
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Improving accuracy of EWT: Cognitive interview THE COGNITIVE INTERVIEW: Fisher and Geiselman (1992) recommended the cognitive interview (CI) to improve eyewitness testimony: 1. Report everything ■ 2. - KNOWLEDGE Witnesses encouraged to include every detail of the event, even it may seem irrelevant/witness x feel confident about Seemingly trivial details may be important / trigger other important memories Reinstate the context 3. Reverse the order ■ O Witness return to original crime scene 'in their mind' → imagine the environment and their emotions Related to context-dependent forgetting Events recalled in different order form from original sequence Prevent reporting expectations + dishonesty 4. Change perspective ■ THE ENHANCED COGNITIVE INTERVIEW: Fisher et al. (1987) developed additional elements of Cl to focus on social dynamics of interaction O Interviewer takes time to establish rapport with the witness, to encourage them to recall more information e.g. reducing eyewitness anxiety, minimising distractions, getting witness to speak slowly, asking open-ended questions Recall incident from other people's perspectives Prevent effect of schema (generate expectations) on recall STRENGTHS Cognitive interview (CI) is a method of interviewing eyewitness to help them retrieve more accurate memories LIMITATIONS VARIATIONS OF THE CI: The 'pick and mix' approach makes cognitive interview more flexible: collection of techniques than overall method O Allow forces to evolve own approaches → adapt the method to individual cases The Cl can be adapted to different situations increase credibility *SUPPORT FOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE CI: Evidence show Cl helps witnesses recall information in...
Average App Rating
Students use Knowunity
In Education App Charts in 11 Countries
Students uploaded study notes
iOS User
Stefan S, iOS User
SuSSan, iOS User
memory but x immediately accessible Meta-analysis by Köhnken et al. (1999) combined data from 55 studies comparing Cl with standard interview O Cl: average 41% increase in accurate information EVALUATION O Only 4 studies showed no difference COUNTERPOINT: Also found increase in amount of inaccurate information recalled O O Particular issue in ECI → more incorrect details than Cl CI may sacrifice accuracy of EWT to favour amount of details → police should treat eyewitness evidence with caution · *SOME ELEMENTS MAY BE MORE USEFUL: Not all of its elements are equally effective or useful Milne and Bull (2002) O All 4 techniques produced more information than standard O Using combination of 'report everything' and 'reinstate the context' produced better recall than other Confirmed police officers' suspicions that some aspects of the Cl are more useful than others O Casts doubt on credibility of overall Cl *THE CI IS TIME-CONSUMING: The Cl takes more time and training than the standard police interview O More time needed to establish rapport with witness and allow them to relax O Requires special training, many forces x have resources to provide more than few hours The complete Cl is not realistic for police officers to use