Evaluating the Behavioural Approach - Key Criticisms and Strengths
Ever wondered if you're truly in control of your actions? The behavioural approach suggests you might not be, which creates some serious problems when we think about responsibility and blame.
Environmental determinism is a major weakness of this approach. Skinner argued that free will is just an illusion - everything we do is simply the result of past learning experiences. This creates a real dilemma for our legal system: how can we hold someone accountable for their crimes if they're not actually choosing their behaviour?
Another significant criticism involves the use of animals in research. Pavlov's dogs and Skinner's rats provided the foundation for understanding conditioning, but can we really apply findings from animal studies to complex human behaviour? Whilst it's more ethical than experimenting on humans, there's a genuine question about whether these findings translate effectively.
Quick Tip: When evaluating any psychological approach, always consider both ethical concerns and practical applications - examiners love to see this balanced thinking!
However, the approach does have notable strengths. The use of scientific methods makes it highly credible - researchers can manipulate specific variables under controlled conditions, ensuring objective and unbiased results that can be replicated.