Subjects

Subjects

More

Search

AI Knowunity

Subjects

/

Psychology

/

Social Psychology

/

Attribution Theories and Fundamental Attribution Error

How Detectives Solve Mysteries: Profiling and Psychology

View

How Detectives Solve Mysteries: Profiling and Psychology
user profile picture

libby Moxey

@libby_moxey

·

704 Followers

Follow

Bottom-up offender profiling techniques, developed by David Canter, use data-driven approaches to understand criminal behavior. This method incorporates investigative psychology and geographical profiling to analyze crime scenes, predict offender characteristics, and map criminal activities. While it has shown success in some cases, there are significant limitations of bottom-up profiling in criminal investigations.

Key points:

  • Focuses on interpersonal coherence, time and place significance, and forensic awareness
  • Utilizes geographical profiling to predict future crime locations
  • Employs Canter's circle theory to categorize offenders as marauders or commuters
  • Has both strengths in supporting investigative psychology and limitations in accuracy and specificity

12/6/2022

445

Bottom-up approach - offender profiling • British approach • David Canter develop hypotheses about the likely characteristics and motivation

View

Canter's Circle Theory and Offender Models

Canter's circle theory, developed by Canter and Larkin, proposes two models of offending based on imagined boundaries within which the offender operates:

  1. The Marauder: Offends close to home.
  2. The Commuter: Likely to travel a distance from their home.

These models provide insights into whether a crime is planned or spontaneous and can reveal personal factors such as transport access, age, and employment status.

Evaluation of the bottom-up approach reveals both strengths and limitations:

Strengths:

  1. Supports investigative psychology: Canter and Heritage (1990) found common characteristics in sexual assault cases, allowing police to predict offender behavior.
  2. Evidence-based: Lundrigan and Canter (2001) provided supporting evidence for geographical profiling in serial killer cases.

Example: Canter and Heritage's study of 66 sexual assault cases revealed common characteristics such as interpersonal language use and lack of reaction towards the victim, aiding in predicting offender behavior.

Highlight: The bottom-up approach's strength lies in its ability to use statistical analysis to identify patterns in criminal behavior, supporting the principles of investigative psychology.

Bottom-up approach - offender profiling • British approach • David Canter develop hypotheses about the likely characteristics and motivation

View

Limitations of Bottom-Up Profiling in Criminal Investigations

Despite its strengths, the bottom-up approach to offender profiling has several significant limitations in criminal investigations:

  1. Overly specific profiles: The Rachel Nickell case in 1992 demonstrates how small errors in profiling can lead to wrongful arrests, as the real killer's height differed slightly from the profile's prediction.

  2. Limited accuracy in identification: Copson (1995) found that while profiler advice was judged useful in 83% of cases, it only led to accurate identification in 3% of cases.

  3. Questionable effectiveness compared to intuitive methods: Kocsis et al. (2002) discovered that chemistry students could produce more accurate offender profiles than experienced senior detectives using the bottom-up approach.

Example: In the Rachel Nickell case, the wrong man was arrested due to a minor height discrepancy in the profile, with the real killer not convicted until 2008.

Highlight: These limitations suggest that while the bottom-up approach can provide useful insights, its accuracy and effectiveness in identifying offenders may be limited compared to other methods.

Quote: "Copson (1995) found that advice from profilers was judged as useful in 83% of cases but it only led to accurate identification in 3% of cases."

These findings indicate that while bottom-up offender profiling techniques can offer valuable perspectives in criminal investigations, they should be used in conjunction with other investigative methods to ensure a comprehensive and accurate approach to solving crimes.

Bottom-up approach - offender profiling • British approach • David Canter develop hypotheses about the likely characteristics and motivation

View

Bottom-Up Approach to Offender Profiling

The bottom-up approach to offender profiling, also known as the British approach, was developed by David Canter. This method uses data-driven techniques to develop hypotheses about offender characteristics and motivations. It incorporates investigative psychology and geographical profiling to analyze crime scenes and predict offender behavior.

Key components of investigative psychology include:

  1. Interpersonal coherence: Analyzing how the offender behaves at the crime scene.
  2. Significance of time and place: Indicating where the offender might be living.
  3. Forensic awareness: Assessing if the offender has been subject to police interrogation before.

Geographical profiling is a crucial aspect of this approach, involving:

  1. Crime mapping: Recording locations of linked offenses.
  2. Predicting future crime locations using "Jeopardy surface" analysis.
  3. Identifying the "centre of gravity" where offenders restrict their crimes to familiar areas.

Example: John Duffy's case demonstrates the successful application of geographical profiling in criminal investigations.

Highlight: The bottom-up approach to offender profiling combines psychological analysis with geographical data to create a comprehensive understanding of criminal behavior patterns.

Can't find what you're looking for? Explore other subjects.

Knowunity is the # 1 ranked education app in five European countries

Knowunity was a featured story by Apple and has consistently topped the app store charts within the education category in Germany, Italy, Poland, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Join Knowunity today and help millions of students around the world.

Ranked #1 Education App

Download in

Google Play

Download in

App Store

Knowunity is the # 1 ranked education app in five European countries

4.9+

Average App Rating

15 M

Students use Knowunity

#1

In Education App Charts in 12 Countries

950 K+

Students uploaded study notes

Still not sure? Look at what your fellow peers are saying...

iOS User

I love this app so much [...] I recommend Knowunity to everyone!!! I went from a C to an A with it :D

Stefan S, iOS User

The application is very simple and well designed. So far I have found what I was looking for :D

SuSSan, iOS User

Love this App ❤️, I use it basically all the time whenever I'm studying

Sign up to see the content. It's free!

Access to all documents

Improve your grades

Join milions of students

By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Subjects

/

Psychology

/

Social Psychology

/

Attribution Theories and Fundamental Attribution Error

How Detectives Solve Mysteries: Profiling and Psychology

user profile picture

libby Moxey

@libby_moxey

·

704 Followers

Follow

Bottom-up offender profiling techniques, developed by David Canter, use data-driven approaches to understand criminal behavior. This method incorporates investigative psychology and geographical profiling to analyze crime scenes, predict offender characteristics, and map criminal activities. While it has shown success in some cases, there are significant limitations of bottom-up profiling in criminal investigations.

Key points:

  • Focuses on interpersonal coherence, time and place significance, and forensic awareness
  • Utilizes geographical profiling to predict future crime locations
  • Employs Canter's circle theory to categorize offenders as marauders or commuters
  • Has both strengths in supporting investigative psychology and limitations in accuracy and specificity

12/6/2022

445

 

12/13

 

Psychology

14

Bottom-up approach - offender profiling • British approach • David Canter develop hypotheses about the likely characteristics and motivation

Canter's Circle Theory and Offender Models

Canter's circle theory, developed by Canter and Larkin, proposes two models of offending based on imagined boundaries within which the offender operates:

  1. The Marauder: Offends close to home.
  2. The Commuter: Likely to travel a distance from their home.

These models provide insights into whether a crime is planned or spontaneous and can reveal personal factors such as transport access, age, and employment status.

Evaluation of the bottom-up approach reveals both strengths and limitations:

Strengths:

  1. Supports investigative psychology: Canter and Heritage (1990) found common characteristics in sexual assault cases, allowing police to predict offender behavior.
  2. Evidence-based: Lundrigan and Canter (2001) provided supporting evidence for geographical profiling in serial killer cases.

Example: Canter and Heritage's study of 66 sexual assault cases revealed common characteristics such as interpersonal language use and lack of reaction towards the victim, aiding in predicting offender behavior.

Highlight: The bottom-up approach's strength lies in its ability to use statistical analysis to identify patterns in criminal behavior, supporting the principles of investigative psychology.

Bottom-up approach - offender profiling • British approach • David Canter develop hypotheses about the likely characteristics and motivation

Limitations of Bottom-Up Profiling in Criminal Investigations

Despite its strengths, the bottom-up approach to offender profiling has several significant limitations in criminal investigations:

  1. Overly specific profiles: The Rachel Nickell case in 1992 demonstrates how small errors in profiling can lead to wrongful arrests, as the real killer's height differed slightly from the profile's prediction.

  2. Limited accuracy in identification: Copson (1995) found that while profiler advice was judged useful in 83% of cases, it only led to accurate identification in 3% of cases.

  3. Questionable effectiveness compared to intuitive methods: Kocsis et al. (2002) discovered that chemistry students could produce more accurate offender profiles than experienced senior detectives using the bottom-up approach.

Example: In the Rachel Nickell case, the wrong man was arrested due to a minor height discrepancy in the profile, with the real killer not convicted until 2008.

Highlight: These limitations suggest that while the bottom-up approach can provide useful insights, its accuracy and effectiveness in identifying offenders may be limited compared to other methods.

Quote: "Copson (1995) found that advice from profilers was judged as useful in 83% of cases but it only led to accurate identification in 3% of cases."

These findings indicate that while bottom-up offender profiling techniques can offer valuable perspectives in criminal investigations, they should be used in conjunction with other investigative methods to ensure a comprehensive and accurate approach to solving crimes.

Bottom-up approach - offender profiling • British approach • David Canter develop hypotheses about the likely characteristics and motivation

Bottom-Up Approach to Offender Profiling

The bottom-up approach to offender profiling, also known as the British approach, was developed by David Canter. This method uses data-driven techniques to develop hypotheses about offender characteristics and motivations. It incorporates investigative psychology and geographical profiling to analyze crime scenes and predict offender behavior.

Key components of investigative psychology include:

  1. Interpersonal coherence: Analyzing how the offender behaves at the crime scene.
  2. Significance of time and place: Indicating where the offender might be living.
  3. Forensic awareness: Assessing if the offender has been subject to police interrogation before.

Geographical profiling is a crucial aspect of this approach, involving:

  1. Crime mapping: Recording locations of linked offenses.
  2. Predicting future crime locations using "Jeopardy surface" analysis.
  3. Identifying the "centre of gravity" where offenders restrict their crimes to familiar areas.

Example: John Duffy's case demonstrates the successful application of geographical profiling in criminal investigations.

Highlight: The bottom-up approach to offender profiling combines psychological analysis with geographical data to create a comprehensive understanding of criminal behavior patterns.

Can't find what you're looking for? Explore other subjects.

Knowunity is the # 1 ranked education app in five European countries

Knowunity was a featured story by Apple and has consistently topped the app store charts within the education category in Germany, Italy, Poland, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Join Knowunity today and help millions of students around the world.

Ranked #1 Education App

Download in

Google Play

Download in

App Store

Knowunity is the # 1 ranked education app in five European countries

4.9+

Average App Rating

15 M

Students use Knowunity

#1

In Education App Charts in 12 Countries

950 K+

Students uploaded study notes

Still not sure? Look at what your fellow peers are saying...

iOS User

I love this app so much [...] I recommend Knowunity to everyone!!! I went from a C to an A with it :D

Stefan S, iOS User

The application is very simple and well designed. So far I have found what I was looking for :D

SuSSan, iOS User

Love this App ❤️, I use it basically all the time whenever I'm studying