The Bill of Rightsfundamentally shaped how state and federal... Show more
Sign up to see the contentIt's free!
Access to all documents
Improve your grades
Join milions of students
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Subjects
Careers
249
•
May 8, 2023
•
Sophia B
@soph250
The Bill of Rightsfundamentally shaped how state and federal... Show more
The Bill of Rights impact on state laws fundamentally shaped American civil liberties. Originally applying only to federal government actions, these first ten amendments now extend to state governments through selective incorporation. The Bill of Rights established crucial protections against government overreach while asserting states' rights and individual freedoms.
Definition: Civil liberties are constitutional provisions that protect individuals from arbitrary government interference.
The Bill of Rights doesn't represent an exhaustive list of rights - it explicitly states that unlisted rights remain with the states and people. This concept, found in the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, creates a framework where federal government powers are limited while preserving state sovereignty and individual liberties.
Through selective incorporation doctrine, the Supreme Court gradually applied most Bill of Rights protections to state governments via the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. This process dramatically expanded civil rights protections for all Americans against both federal and state government actions.
The First Amendment freedoms and restrictions regarding religion rest on two key principles: the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. The Establishment Clause prevents government from establishing an official religion or showing preference for any faith tradition.
Highlight: Government aid to religious institutions must remain neutral and cannot promote religious doctrine.
Courts have established clear guidelines around religious expression in public spaces. Government-sponsored prayer faces strict limitations in settings with "captive audiences" like public schools, though some religious accommodation is permitted in contexts like prisons. Religious symbols in government spaces face scrutiny based on whether they appear to constitute government endorsement.
The landmark case Engel v. Vitale established crucial precedent when the Supreme Court ruled that state-authorized school prayer violated the Establishment Clause, even if voluntary. This decision helped shape modern interpretation of church-state separation.
The Lemon Test for religion and government separation provides a three-part framework for evaluating whether government actions improperly entangle church and state. This test examines:
Vocabulary: The three prongs of the Lemon Test:
Wisconsin v. Yoder demonstrated how courts balance religious freedom against state interests. When Amish families challenged mandatory school attendance laws, the Supreme Court ruled that their sincere religious beliefs outweighed the state's educational requirements. This established important precedent for religious exemptions from generally applicable laws.
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 created an additional layer of protection by requiring strict scrutiny when government actions burden religious practice. Courts must evaluate whether such restrictions serve a compelling state interest through narrowly tailored means.
The Supreme Court's approach to religious freedom continues evolving through case-by-case analysis rather than blanket exemptions. When examining religiously-neutral and generally applicable laws, the Court weighs competing interests carefully.
Example: Religious exemption requests for vaccination requirements must be evaluated based on:
Modern religious freedom cases often involve balancing individual religious rights against other constitutional principles and public interests. Courts examine whether government restrictions on religious practice serve compelling state interests and use the least restrictive means possible.
The ongoing interpretation of religious freedom protections demonstrates the dynamic nature of constitutional law as courts apply established principles to new situations. This process requires careful consideration of both religious liberty and other important societal interests.
The First Amendment freedoms and restrictions have been shaped significantly through landmark Supreme Court cases. The Tinker v. Des Moines case established crucial precedents for student expression rights in schools. When students wore black armbands to protest the Vietnam War, the Court ruled that symbolic speech deserves constitutional protection unless it substantially disrupts school operations.
Definition: Symbolic speech refers to non-verbal expressions that convey a clear message, such as wearing armbands or burning flags as forms of protest.
The Supreme Court has carefully defined categories of unprotected speech through various decisions. These include defamatory statements, fighting words, obscene material, and speech that incites immediate illegal action. Government employees speaking in their official capacity also face certain restrictions on their expression rights.
The Schenck v. United States case introduced the Clear and Present Danger test for evaluating speech restrictions. This standard examined whether speech created an immediate risk of harm that Congress had authority to prevent. This was later replaced by the more speech-protective Imminent Lawless Action test established in Brandenburg v. Ohio.
Highlight: The evolution from Clear and Present Danger to Imminent Lawless Action demonstrates how First Amendment protections have generally expanded over time to provide greater speech protection.
Freedom of the press serves as a cornerstone of democratic society by enabling citizens to hold government accountable. The historic trial of John Peter Zenger in 1733 established truth as a defense against libel charges, setting an important precedent for press freedom in America.
Example: When Zenger published articles exposing corruption by New York's royal governor, his acquittal helped establish that truthful reporting about government officials deserves legal protection.
Modern press protections include shield laws protecting confidential sources and strong presumptions against prior restraint . The Pentagon Papers case, New York Times Co. v. United States, reinforced that the government faces an extremely heavy burden when trying to prevent publication of information.
However, press freedom has defined limitations. Publications that incite imminent lawless action remain unprotected. Additionally, knowingly false statements about public officials made with actual malice can result in liability, and reporters may be required to testify in important cases despite shield law protections.
The Second Amendment has been interpreted to protect individual gun ownership rights while allowing reasonable regulation. In District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court confirmed that the right to bear arms extends beyond militia service to include individual self-defense rights.
Vocabulary: The term "militia" historically referred to civilian military forces that could be called upon to defend the nation, distinct from professional standing armies.
Congress exercises authority to regulate firearms through multiple constitutional powers:
Important restrictions remain constitutional, including:
Definition: "Prior restraint" refers to government actions that prohibit speech or publication before it occurs, which face strict constitutional scrutiny.
The Supreme Court has established boundaries on federal gun control authority through cases like United States v. Lopez, which struck down the Gun-Free School Zones Act as exceeding Commerce Clause powers. This decision emphasized that federal gun regulations must maintain a meaningful connection to interstate commerce.
McDonald v. Chicago extended Second Amendment protections to state and local governments through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. This ruling prevented states from imposing excessive restrictions on firearm possession while still allowing reasonable regulations.
Highlight: While protecting individual gun rights, courts have consistently recognized that Second Amendment rights are not unlimited and remain subject to reasonable regulation.
The interplay between federal and state authority over firearms continues to evolve through legislation and court decisions. States retain significant power to regulate guns within their borders, provided they don't violate core Second Amendment rights as defined by the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court's decisions in U.S. v. Lopez and McDonald v. Chicago fundamentally shaped the boundaries of federal power and individual rights regarding firearms. These landmark cases demonstrate how the Bill of Rights impact on state laws continues to evolve through judicial interpretation.
In U.S. v. Lopez, the Supreme Court addressed Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause when it examined the Gun-Free School Zones Act, which made it illegal to possess firearms within 1,000 feet of schools. When Lopez challenged his conviction, the Court ruled that simply having a gun in a school zone wasn't sufficiently connected to interstate commerce to justify federal regulation. This decision marked a crucial limit on Congress's power to regulate activities through the Commerce Clause.
Definition: The Commerce Clause gives Congress the power to regulate commerce among states, but U.S. v. Lopez established that this power has limits when activities are primarily local in nature.
The McDonald v. Chicago case further transformed gun rights by addressing state-level firearms regulations. After the Court's decision in D.C. v. Heller established an individual right to bear arms at the federal level, Chicago residents challenged their city's strict gun registration requirements. The Court's decision selectively incorporated the Second Amendment through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, making it applicable to state governments.
Highlight: While McDonald v. Chicago prevented states from completely banning firearms, it preserved their ability to implement reasonable regulations. This balance reflects the ongoing tension between individual rights and public safety concerns.
The evolution of gun rights through Supreme Court decisions illustrates the complex relationship between federal authority and state sovereignty. These cases demonstrate how constitutional interpretation adapts to contemporary challenges while respecting historical traditions.
The Lopez decision represented a significant shift in Commerce Clause jurisprudence. By ruling that the Gun-Free School Zones Act exceeded Congress's commerce power, the Court established that federal authority has meaningful limits. This interpretation reinforced the principle of federalism by preserving state police powers in areas traditionally under local control.
Example: Following Lopez, Congress revised the Gun-Free School Zones Act to include a jurisdictional element requiring that guns must have moved in interstate commerce. This modification shows how federal legislation can be adapted to comply with constitutional limitations.
McDonald's impact on state gun regulations demonstrates the ongoing process of selective incorporation, through which specific protections in the Bill of Rights are made applicable to states. The Court's recognition of firearm possession for self-defense as a fundamental right deeply rooted in American tradition established a national baseline for gun rights while still allowing for reasonable regulation at the state level.
The interplay between these decisions continues to shape contemporary debates about gun regulation, illustrating how constitutional principles evolve through judicial interpretation while maintaining core protections for individual rights.
App Store
Google Play
The app is very easy to use and well designed. I have found everything I was looking for so far and have been able to learn a lot from the presentations! I will definitely use the app for a class assignment! And of course it also helps a lot as an inspiration.
Stefan S
iOS user
This app is really great. There are so many study notes and help [...]. My problem subject is French, for example, and the app has so many options for help. Thanks to this app, I have improved my French. I would recommend it to anyone.
Samantha Klich
Android user
Wow, I am really amazed. I just tried the app because I've seen it advertised many times and was absolutely stunned. This app is THE HELP you want for school and above all, it offers so many things, such as workouts and fact sheets, which have been VERY helpful to me personally.
Anna
iOS user
I think it’s very much worth it and you’ll end up using it a lot once you get the hang of it and even after looking at others notes you can still ask your Artificial intelligence buddy the question and ask to simplify it if you still don’t get it!!! In the end I think it’s worth it 😊👍 ⚠️Also DID I MENTION ITS FREEE YOU DON’T HAVE TO PAY FOR ANYTHING AND STILL GET YOUR GRADES IN PERFECTLY❗️❗️⚠️
Thomas R
iOS user
Knowunity is the BEST app I’ve used in a minute. This is not an ai review or anything this is genuinely coming from a 7th grade student (I know 2011 im young) but dude this app is a 10/10 i have maintained a 3.8 gpa and have plenty of time for gaming. I love it and my mom is just happy I got good grades
Brad T
Android user
Not only did it help me find the answer but it also showed me alternative ways to solve it. I was horrible in math and science but now I have an a in both subjects. Thanks for the help🤍🤍
David K
iOS user
The app's just great! All I have to do is enter the topic in the search bar and I get the response real fast. I don't have to watch 10 YouTube videos to understand something, so I'm saving my time. Highly recommended!
Sudenaz Ocak
Android user
In school I was really bad at maths but thanks to the app, I am doing better now. I am so grateful that you made the app.
Greenlight Bonnie
Android user
I found this app a couple years ago and it has only gotten better since then. I really love it because it can help with written questions and photo questions. Also, it can find study guides that other people have made as well as flashcard sets and practice tests. The free version is also amazing for students who might not be able to afford it. Would 100% recommend
Aubrey
iOS user
Best app if you're in Highschool or Junior high. I have been using this app for 2 school years and it's the best, it's good if you don't have anyone to help you with school work.😋🩷🎀
Marco B
iOS user
THE QUIZES AND FLASHCARDS ARE SO USEFUL AND I LOVE THE SCHOOLGPT. IT ALSO IS LITREALLY LIKE CHATGPT BUT SMARTER!! HELPED ME WITH MY MASCARA PROBLEMS TOO!! AS WELL AS MY REAL SUBJECTS ! DUHHH 😍😁😲🤑💗✨🎀😮
Elisha
iOS user
This app is phenomenal down to the correct info and the various topics you can study! I greatly recommend it for people who struggle with procrastination and those who need homework help. It has been perfectly accurate for world 1 history as far as I’ve seen! Geometry too!
Paul T
iOS user
The app is very easy to use and well designed. I have found everything I was looking for so far and have been able to learn a lot from the presentations! I will definitely use the app for a class assignment! And of course it also helps a lot as an inspiration.
Stefan S
iOS user
This app is really great. There are so many study notes and help [...]. My problem subject is French, for example, and the app has so many options for help. Thanks to this app, I have improved my French. I would recommend it to anyone.
Samantha Klich
Android user
Wow, I am really amazed. I just tried the app because I've seen it advertised many times and was absolutely stunned. This app is THE HELP you want for school and above all, it offers so many things, such as workouts and fact sheets, which have been VERY helpful to me personally.
Anna
iOS user
I think it’s very much worth it and you’ll end up using it a lot once you get the hang of it and even after looking at others notes you can still ask your Artificial intelligence buddy the question and ask to simplify it if you still don’t get it!!! In the end I think it’s worth it 😊👍 ⚠️Also DID I MENTION ITS FREEE YOU DON’T HAVE TO PAY FOR ANYTHING AND STILL GET YOUR GRADES IN PERFECTLY❗️❗️⚠️
Thomas R
iOS user
Knowunity is the BEST app I’ve used in a minute. This is not an ai review or anything this is genuinely coming from a 7th grade student (I know 2011 im young) but dude this app is a 10/10 i have maintained a 3.8 gpa and have plenty of time for gaming. I love it and my mom is just happy I got good grades
Brad T
Android user
Not only did it help me find the answer but it also showed me alternative ways to solve it. I was horrible in math and science but now I have an a in both subjects. Thanks for the help🤍🤍
David K
iOS user
The app's just great! All I have to do is enter the topic in the search bar and I get the response real fast. I don't have to watch 10 YouTube videos to understand something, so I'm saving my time. Highly recommended!
Sudenaz Ocak
Android user
In school I was really bad at maths but thanks to the app, I am doing better now. I am so grateful that you made the app.
Greenlight Bonnie
Android user
I found this app a couple years ago and it has only gotten better since then. I really love it because it can help with written questions and photo questions. Also, it can find study guides that other people have made as well as flashcard sets and practice tests. The free version is also amazing for students who might not be able to afford it. Would 100% recommend
Aubrey
iOS user
Best app if you're in Highschool or Junior high. I have been using this app for 2 school years and it's the best, it's good if you don't have anyone to help you with school work.😋🩷🎀
Marco B
iOS user
THE QUIZES AND FLASHCARDS ARE SO USEFUL AND I LOVE THE SCHOOLGPT. IT ALSO IS LITREALLY LIKE CHATGPT BUT SMARTER!! HELPED ME WITH MY MASCARA PROBLEMS TOO!! AS WELL AS MY REAL SUBJECTS ! DUHHH 😍😁😲🤑💗✨🎀😮
Elisha
iOS user
This app is phenomenal down to the correct info and the various topics you can study! I greatly recommend it for people who struggle with procrastination and those who need homework help. It has been perfectly accurate for world 1 history as far as I’ve seen! Geometry too!
Paul T
iOS user
Sophia B
@soph250
The Bill of Rightsfundamentally shaped how state and federal laws protect individual liberties across the United States. When first created, these constitutional amendments only restricted federal government actions, but through a process called incorporation, most protections now apply to... Show more
Access to all documents
Improve your grades
Join milions of students
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
The Bill of Rights impact on state laws fundamentally shaped American civil liberties. Originally applying only to federal government actions, these first ten amendments now extend to state governments through selective incorporation. The Bill of Rights established crucial protections against government overreach while asserting states' rights and individual freedoms.
Definition: Civil liberties are constitutional provisions that protect individuals from arbitrary government interference.
The Bill of Rights doesn't represent an exhaustive list of rights - it explicitly states that unlisted rights remain with the states and people. This concept, found in the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, creates a framework where federal government powers are limited while preserving state sovereignty and individual liberties.
Through selective incorporation doctrine, the Supreme Court gradually applied most Bill of Rights protections to state governments via the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. This process dramatically expanded civil rights protections for all Americans against both federal and state government actions.
Access to all documents
Improve your grades
Join milions of students
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
The First Amendment freedoms and restrictions regarding religion rest on two key principles: the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. The Establishment Clause prevents government from establishing an official religion or showing preference for any faith tradition.
Highlight: Government aid to religious institutions must remain neutral and cannot promote religious doctrine.
Courts have established clear guidelines around religious expression in public spaces. Government-sponsored prayer faces strict limitations in settings with "captive audiences" like public schools, though some religious accommodation is permitted in contexts like prisons. Religious symbols in government spaces face scrutiny based on whether they appear to constitute government endorsement.
The landmark case Engel v. Vitale established crucial precedent when the Supreme Court ruled that state-authorized school prayer violated the Establishment Clause, even if voluntary. This decision helped shape modern interpretation of church-state separation.
Access to all documents
Improve your grades
Join milions of students
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
The Lemon Test for religion and government separation provides a three-part framework for evaluating whether government actions improperly entangle church and state. This test examines:
Vocabulary: The three prongs of the Lemon Test:
Wisconsin v. Yoder demonstrated how courts balance religious freedom against state interests. When Amish families challenged mandatory school attendance laws, the Supreme Court ruled that their sincere religious beliefs outweighed the state's educational requirements. This established important precedent for religious exemptions from generally applicable laws.
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 created an additional layer of protection by requiring strict scrutiny when government actions burden religious practice. Courts must evaluate whether such restrictions serve a compelling state interest through narrowly tailored means.
Access to all documents
Improve your grades
Join milions of students
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
The Supreme Court's approach to religious freedom continues evolving through case-by-case analysis rather than blanket exemptions. When examining religiously-neutral and generally applicable laws, the Court weighs competing interests carefully.
Example: Religious exemption requests for vaccination requirements must be evaluated based on:
Modern religious freedom cases often involve balancing individual religious rights against other constitutional principles and public interests. Courts examine whether government restrictions on religious practice serve compelling state interests and use the least restrictive means possible.
The ongoing interpretation of religious freedom protections demonstrates the dynamic nature of constitutional law as courts apply established principles to new situations. This process requires careful consideration of both religious liberty and other important societal interests.
Access to all documents
Improve your grades
Join milions of students
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
The First Amendment freedoms and restrictions have been shaped significantly through landmark Supreme Court cases. The Tinker v. Des Moines case established crucial precedents for student expression rights in schools. When students wore black armbands to protest the Vietnam War, the Court ruled that symbolic speech deserves constitutional protection unless it substantially disrupts school operations.
Definition: Symbolic speech refers to non-verbal expressions that convey a clear message, such as wearing armbands or burning flags as forms of protest.
The Supreme Court has carefully defined categories of unprotected speech through various decisions. These include defamatory statements, fighting words, obscene material, and speech that incites immediate illegal action. Government employees speaking in their official capacity also face certain restrictions on their expression rights.
The Schenck v. United States case introduced the Clear and Present Danger test for evaluating speech restrictions. This standard examined whether speech created an immediate risk of harm that Congress had authority to prevent. This was later replaced by the more speech-protective Imminent Lawless Action test established in Brandenburg v. Ohio.
Highlight: The evolution from Clear and Present Danger to Imminent Lawless Action demonstrates how First Amendment protections have generally expanded over time to provide greater speech protection.
Access to all documents
Improve your grades
Join milions of students
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Freedom of the press serves as a cornerstone of democratic society by enabling citizens to hold government accountable. The historic trial of John Peter Zenger in 1733 established truth as a defense against libel charges, setting an important precedent for press freedom in America.
Example: When Zenger published articles exposing corruption by New York's royal governor, his acquittal helped establish that truthful reporting about government officials deserves legal protection.
Modern press protections include shield laws protecting confidential sources and strong presumptions against prior restraint . The Pentagon Papers case, New York Times Co. v. United States, reinforced that the government faces an extremely heavy burden when trying to prevent publication of information.
However, press freedom has defined limitations. Publications that incite imminent lawless action remain unprotected. Additionally, knowingly false statements about public officials made with actual malice can result in liability, and reporters may be required to testify in important cases despite shield law protections.
Access to all documents
Improve your grades
Join milions of students
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
The Second Amendment has been interpreted to protect individual gun ownership rights while allowing reasonable regulation. In District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court confirmed that the right to bear arms extends beyond militia service to include individual self-defense rights.
Vocabulary: The term "militia" historically referred to civilian military forces that could be called upon to defend the nation, distinct from professional standing armies.
Congress exercises authority to regulate firearms through multiple constitutional powers:
Important restrictions remain constitutional, including:
Definition: "Prior restraint" refers to government actions that prohibit speech or publication before it occurs, which face strict constitutional scrutiny.
Access to all documents
Improve your grades
Join milions of students
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
The Supreme Court has established boundaries on federal gun control authority through cases like United States v. Lopez, which struck down the Gun-Free School Zones Act as exceeding Commerce Clause powers. This decision emphasized that federal gun regulations must maintain a meaningful connection to interstate commerce.
McDonald v. Chicago extended Second Amendment protections to state and local governments through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. This ruling prevented states from imposing excessive restrictions on firearm possession while still allowing reasonable regulations.
Highlight: While protecting individual gun rights, courts have consistently recognized that Second Amendment rights are not unlimited and remain subject to reasonable regulation.
The interplay between federal and state authority over firearms continues to evolve through legislation and court decisions. States retain significant power to regulate guns within their borders, provided they don't violate core Second Amendment rights as defined by the Supreme Court.
Access to all documents
Improve your grades
Join milions of students
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
The Supreme Court's decisions in U.S. v. Lopez and McDonald v. Chicago fundamentally shaped the boundaries of federal power and individual rights regarding firearms. These landmark cases demonstrate how the Bill of Rights impact on state laws continues to evolve through judicial interpretation.
In U.S. v. Lopez, the Supreme Court addressed Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause when it examined the Gun-Free School Zones Act, which made it illegal to possess firearms within 1,000 feet of schools. When Lopez challenged his conviction, the Court ruled that simply having a gun in a school zone wasn't sufficiently connected to interstate commerce to justify federal regulation. This decision marked a crucial limit on Congress's power to regulate activities through the Commerce Clause.
Definition: The Commerce Clause gives Congress the power to regulate commerce among states, but U.S. v. Lopez established that this power has limits when activities are primarily local in nature.
The McDonald v. Chicago case further transformed gun rights by addressing state-level firearms regulations. After the Court's decision in D.C. v. Heller established an individual right to bear arms at the federal level, Chicago residents challenged their city's strict gun registration requirements. The Court's decision selectively incorporated the Second Amendment through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, making it applicable to state governments.
Highlight: While McDonald v. Chicago prevented states from completely banning firearms, it preserved their ability to implement reasonable regulations. This balance reflects the ongoing tension between individual rights and public safety concerns.
Access to all documents
Improve your grades
Join milions of students
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
The evolution of gun rights through Supreme Court decisions illustrates the complex relationship between federal authority and state sovereignty. These cases demonstrate how constitutional interpretation adapts to contemporary challenges while respecting historical traditions.
The Lopez decision represented a significant shift in Commerce Clause jurisprudence. By ruling that the Gun-Free School Zones Act exceeded Congress's commerce power, the Court established that federal authority has meaningful limits. This interpretation reinforced the principle of federalism by preserving state police powers in areas traditionally under local control.
Example: Following Lopez, Congress revised the Gun-Free School Zones Act to include a jurisdictional element requiring that guns must have moved in interstate commerce. This modification shows how federal legislation can be adapted to comply with constitutional limitations.
McDonald's impact on state gun regulations demonstrates the ongoing process of selective incorporation, through which specific protections in the Bill of Rights are made applicable to states. The Court's recognition of firearm possession for self-defense as a fundamental right deeply rooted in American tradition established a national baseline for gun rights while still allowing for reasonable regulation at the state level.
The interplay between these decisions continues to shape contemporary debates about gun regulation, illustrating how constitutional principles evolve through judicial interpretation while maintaining core protections for individual rights.
App Store
Google Play
The app is very easy to use and well designed. I have found everything I was looking for so far and have been able to learn a lot from the presentations! I will definitely use the app for a class assignment! And of course it also helps a lot as an inspiration.
Stefan S
iOS user
This app is really great. There are so many study notes and help [...]. My problem subject is French, for example, and the app has so many options for help. Thanks to this app, I have improved my French. I would recommend it to anyone.
Samantha Klich
Android user
Wow, I am really amazed. I just tried the app because I've seen it advertised many times and was absolutely stunned. This app is THE HELP you want for school and above all, it offers so many things, such as workouts and fact sheets, which have been VERY helpful to me personally.
Anna
iOS user
I think it’s very much worth it and you’ll end up using it a lot once you get the hang of it and even after looking at others notes you can still ask your Artificial intelligence buddy the question and ask to simplify it if you still don’t get it!!! In the end I think it’s worth it 😊👍 ⚠️Also DID I MENTION ITS FREEE YOU DON’T HAVE TO PAY FOR ANYTHING AND STILL GET YOUR GRADES IN PERFECTLY❗️❗️⚠️
Thomas R
iOS user
Knowunity is the BEST app I’ve used in a minute. This is not an ai review or anything this is genuinely coming from a 7th grade student (I know 2011 im young) but dude this app is a 10/10 i have maintained a 3.8 gpa and have plenty of time for gaming. I love it and my mom is just happy I got good grades
Brad T
Android user
Not only did it help me find the answer but it also showed me alternative ways to solve it. I was horrible in math and science but now I have an a in both subjects. Thanks for the help🤍🤍
David K
iOS user
The app's just great! All I have to do is enter the topic in the search bar and I get the response real fast. I don't have to watch 10 YouTube videos to understand something, so I'm saving my time. Highly recommended!
Sudenaz Ocak
Android user
In school I was really bad at maths but thanks to the app, I am doing better now. I am so grateful that you made the app.
Greenlight Bonnie
Android user
I found this app a couple years ago and it has only gotten better since then. I really love it because it can help with written questions and photo questions. Also, it can find study guides that other people have made as well as flashcard sets and practice tests. The free version is also amazing for students who might not be able to afford it. Would 100% recommend
Aubrey
iOS user
Best app if you're in Highschool or Junior high. I have been using this app for 2 school years and it's the best, it's good if you don't have anyone to help you with school work.😋🩷🎀
Marco B
iOS user
THE QUIZES AND FLASHCARDS ARE SO USEFUL AND I LOVE THE SCHOOLGPT. IT ALSO IS LITREALLY LIKE CHATGPT BUT SMARTER!! HELPED ME WITH MY MASCARA PROBLEMS TOO!! AS WELL AS MY REAL SUBJECTS ! DUHHH 😍😁😲🤑💗✨🎀😮
Elisha
iOS user
This app is phenomenal down to the correct info and the various topics you can study! I greatly recommend it for people who struggle with procrastination and those who need homework help. It has been perfectly accurate for world 1 history as far as I’ve seen! Geometry too!
Paul T
iOS user
The app is very easy to use and well designed. I have found everything I was looking for so far and have been able to learn a lot from the presentations! I will definitely use the app for a class assignment! And of course it also helps a lot as an inspiration.
Stefan S
iOS user
This app is really great. There are so many study notes and help [...]. My problem subject is French, for example, and the app has so many options for help. Thanks to this app, I have improved my French. I would recommend it to anyone.
Samantha Klich
Android user
Wow, I am really amazed. I just tried the app because I've seen it advertised many times and was absolutely stunned. This app is THE HELP you want for school and above all, it offers so many things, such as workouts and fact sheets, which have been VERY helpful to me personally.
Anna
iOS user
I think it’s very much worth it and you’ll end up using it a lot once you get the hang of it and even after looking at others notes you can still ask your Artificial intelligence buddy the question and ask to simplify it if you still don’t get it!!! In the end I think it’s worth it 😊👍 ⚠️Also DID I MENTION ITS FREEE YOU DON’T HAVE TO PAY FOR ANYTHING AND STILL GET YOUR GRADES IN PERFECTLY❗️❗️⚠️
Thomas R
iOS user
Knowunity is the BEST app I’ve used in a minute. This is not an ai review or anything this is genuinely coming from a 7th grade student (I know 2011 im young) but dude this app is a 10/10 i have maintained a 3.8 gpa and have plenty of time for gaming. I love it and my mom is just happy I got good grades
Brad T
Android user
Not only did it help me find the answer but it also showed me alternative ways to solve it. I was horrible in math and science but now I have an a in both subjects. Thanks for the help🤍🤍
David K
iOS user
The app's just great! All I have to do is enter the topic in the search bar and I get the response real fast. I don't have to watch 10 YouTube videos to understand something, so I'm saving my time. Highly recommended!
Sudenaz Ocak
Android user
In school I was really bad at maths but thanks to the app, I am doing better now. I am so grateful that you made the app.
Greenlight Bonnie
Android user
I found this app a couple years ago and it has only gotten better since then. I really love it because it can help with written questions and photo questions. Also, it can find study guides that other people have made as well as flashcard sets and practice tests. The free version is also amazing for students who might not be able to afford it. Would 100% recommend
Aubrey
iOS user
Best app if you're in Highschool or Junior high. I have been using this app for 2 school years and it's the best, it's good if you don't have anyone to help you with school work.😋🩷🎀
Marco B
iOS user
THE QUIZES AND FLASHCARDS ARE SO USEFUL AND I LOVE THE SCHOOLGPT. IT ALSO IS LITREALLY LIKE CHATGPT BUT SMARTER!! HELPED ME WITH MY MASCARA PROBLEMS TOO!! AS WELL AS MY REAL SUBJECTS ! DUHHH 😍😁😲🤑💗✨🎀😮
Elisha
iOS user
This app is phenomenal down to the correct info and the various topics you can study! I greatly recommend it for people who struggle with procrastination and those who need homework help. It has been perfectly accurate for world 1 history as far as I’ve seen! Geometry too!
Paul T
iOS user