Download in
Google Play
Personality
Abnormal psychology
Consciousness
Human development
Sensation and perception
Research methods in psychology
Overview
Learning and memory
Biological bases of behavior
Ethical issues in psychology
Motivation and emotion
Introduction to psychology
Cognition and intelligence
Social psychology
Show all topics
3/2/2023
219
8
Share
Save
Sign up
Access to all documents
Join milions of students
Improve your grades
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Sign up
Access to all documents
Join milions of students
Improve your grades
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Sign up
Access to all documents
Join milions of students
Improve your grades
By signing up you accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Eysenck's Criminal Personality Personality theory: Proposed by Eysenck (1947). → Behaviour is represented along 2 dimensions: • Introversion-extraversion (E) • Neuroticism-stability (N) → Later added a third dimension - Psychoticism-stability (P) Biological basis of psychological traits: Personality traits come from the type of nervous system we inherit. Extraverts: • Underactive nervous system = seek excitement and carry out risky behaviours. Neurotics: • High level of reactivity in the sympathetic nervous system - nervous, jumpy, overanxious and unpredictable. Psychotics: • Higher levels of testosterone - unemotional and prone to aggression. Eysenck's Criminal Personality 1 Role of Socialisation: Socialisation - learning to delay gratification and about social standards. Offenders are developmentally immature - selfish and wanting immediate gratification (cannot wait for things). People with high E and N scores are less likely to be affected by socialisation. - How do we measure criminal personality? › Developed the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ). Places respondents on the E, N and P dimensions. → It's Important that we can measure personality to support the theory. Have a go at the EPQ yourself... are you a criminal ? https://similarminds.com/eysenck.html Research support: Eysenck and Eysenck (1977): Compared 2070 male prisoners' scores on the EPQ to 2422 male controls. What is wrong with this sample? Prisoners showed higher scores on extraversion, neuroticism and psychoticism. Contradictory support: Farrington et al., (1982): Meta-analysis showed that criminals score higher on psychoticism but not extraversion and neuroticism Does the criminal...
Average App Rating
Students use Knowunity
In Education App Charts in 11 Countries
Students uploaded study notes
iOS User
Stefan S, iOS User
SuSSan, iOS User
personality apply to all cultures? The theory cannot account for cultural factors. Bartol and Holanchock (1979): → Studied Hispanic and African-American offenders – divided into 6 groups depending on nature of their crime. Sample is culturally different to Eysenck's Eysenck's Criminal Personality 2 →All 6 groups were less extraverted than a non-offender control group (opposite to the theories predictions). → Limited application cannot generalise the criminal personality to all cultures Too simplistic: → Offending behaviour is unlikely to be the result of personality alone. Personality is very complex. → Hard to measure personality - can you really reduce personality to a score? Personality is too complex to quantify - it changes depending on mood and situation. If personality is not static then you cannot use the EPQ to find criminals + undermine the claims of the theory Eysenck's Criminal Personality 3