Historical Significance and Bias
Pigafetta's account contains several biases we should recognize. As Magellan's right-hand man, he naturally portrayed the Spanish forces in a heroic light. He likely exaggerated the number of Lapu-Lapu's warriors to make the Spanish appear more valiant to his European audience—having over 1,000 fighters on a small island seems improbable.
His foreign perspective also shaped the narrative. Lapu-Lapu (whom he called "Cilapulapu") and the Mactan warriors were described with minimal detail, while Magellan and his men were portrayed as heroic despite their defeat.
Despite these limitations, Pigafetta's eyewitness account remains invaluable. As the only surviving detailed record of this critical event, it helps us understand an important moment of indigenous resistance in Philippine history.
The Battle of Mactan, as documented by Pigafetta, represents the first recorded organized resistance by Filipinos against foreign invaders. This makes his journal not just historically significant but foundational to understanding Philippine national identity and the beginning of colonial encounters in the region.
Critical thinking note: When reading primary sources like Pigafetta's account, always consider the author's perspective and potential biases. Ask yourself: How might his loyalty to Magellan and European values have colored his description of events?