Evaluating Social Learning Theory
SLT has some brilliant strengths that make it superior to earlier learning theories. Most importantly, it recognises that cognitive factors play a crucial role in learning. Classical and operant conditioning alone can't explain how humans learn complex behaviours.
Think about it - learning would be incredibly slow and dangerous if we only learned from our own mistakes. Bandura pointed out that we rely on observing others to make judgements about appropriate behaviour. This makes SLT a much more comprehensive explanation of human learning.
However, there are some significant criticisms. SLT largely ignores biological factors like hormones (such as testosterone affecting aggression). Recent research suggests mirror neurons might explain our ability to empathise and imitate, indicating that biology plays a bigger role than Bandura originally thought.
Another major criticism focuses on the artificial laboratory settings used in research. Most studies observed young children in labs, which could lead to demand characteristics and unrealistic behaviour.
Critical Thinking: Consider how biological and environmental factors might work together in social learning.